data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d2a2/7d2a2bed3cbcb61690b1087fd453ae42587f767b" alt=""
From Problem 2.13 we know that,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53593/535934f28c99ae03e2e19d5404947694560e518a" alt=""
From (1) and (2) we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1220/d1220f791c1ba430101ddbd95491432f364ed1c5" alt=""
In (4), h-h0 represents height above sea level and P0 the atmospheric pressure at sea level and T I am guessing is assumed to be 273K.
So at a height of 5 Km above sea level we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eddd1/eddd108d9de182a8830fa6f296f4bf8d693d25a0" alt=""
Similarly at a height of 5 Km below sea level we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cf33/2cf3309b039930fd796d40b01869db9e26e30791" alt=""
though 5 km is less shouln't we consider the change in gravity and right g as a function of h and then integrate from the basic.
ReplyDeleteNo, that’s silly. 5km is nothing compared to the radius of Earth. Gravity 5km up will be (6371/6376)^2 = 99.8% of surface strength.
Delete